Post by account_disabled on Nov 29, 2023 10:37:45 GMT
They are often less effective than existing solutions and may only solve part of the problem, but the cost is structurally different. So they are cheaper but worse. Cheaper but worse doesn't sound very convincing, does it? This is what those in power think. They may identify a potential opportunity and may even pay lip service to the fact that they should pursue it, but ultimately, their financial incentives favor maintaining the status quo.
Herein lies the dilemma. There is usually a small segment of the market that thinks a Phone Number List new service is good enough. It may not be gold-plated, but it solves their urgent need and they can afford it. As they invest, it gets better and better, capturing more and more market opportunities, until it meets the core needs of even the high-end market Money cascades to new entrants, leaving established companies in trouble. Let's get back to cheaper but worse innovations.
To me this sounds a lot like the idea of building a brand online. Let’s take a look at the details: The established way to build a brand for a generation is through mass-market TV advertising and other classic online spend. Spending upwards of $100 million is not uncommon. Yes, it’s cheaper to build your brand online, but it’s not as effective yet. Existing brand builders pay lip service to digital, but fee structures and financial incentives, you realize they would rather see TV get bigger than All this confusion of internet marketing.
Herein lies the dilemma. There is usually a small segment of the market that thinks a Phone Number List new service is good enough. It may not be gold-plated, but it solves their urgent need and they can afford it. As they invest, it gets better and better, capturing more and more market opportunities, until it meets the core needs of even the high-end market Money cascades to new entrants, leaving established companies in trouble. Let's get back to cheaper but worse innovations.
To me this sounds a lot like the idea of building a brand online. Let’s take a look at the details: The established way to build a brand for a generation is through mass-market TV advertising and other classic online spend. Spending upwards of $100 million is not uncommon. Yes, it’s cheaper to build your brand online, but it’s not as effective yet. Existing brand builders pay lip service to digital, but fee structures and financial incentives, you realize they would rather see TV get bigger than All this confusion of internet marketing.